Prompt: Many historians characterize early Greek science, from the
Presocratics to Aristotle, as a golden age of physics (despite the fact that
early Greek physics was not quantitative in character). For the Hellenistic
period, in contrast, the discoveries of mathematicians (including mathematical
astronomers and mathematical geographers) stand out more than those of the
physicists. Do you agree that there was a general
shift from physics to mathematics in the Hellenistic period? If
so, what might have caused or contributed to it, and why is it significant?
The Hellenistic period was the time when the Greek influence
was spread furthest across the globe.
From Egypt to India to Italy sprang a new melding together of
cultures. With the death of Alexander
the Great the power of Greece shifted from the home peninsula and the
city-states to Alexandria of Egypt and Ptolemy.
With this shift thousands of families took up root from the homeland and
traveled to Egypt and elsewhere. In
their new cities they began correspondence with their new neighbors. Those with backgrounds in philosophy and
education surely met up in societies and compared notes and ideas. The intermingling of differing cultures seems
to result in the exchange of applicable ideas much more so than theoretical
ones. Mathematics has many uses in
engineering, astronomy, sociology, statistics, cartography and geography, while
physics is only useful to a select few and only often times with the assistance
of mathematics. I believe that the
dominance of mathematics in the Hellenistic period is due to the fact that an
exchange of application worthy ideas is much more beneficial in the short term,
whereas something like the study of physics requires a stable base like that
held by the city-states for centuries.
The factions of the Hellenistic period were constantly warring with one
another and that fact alone is fairly prohibitive of theoretical studies even
today. More emphasis is placed on
crunching the numbers of how one would be able to fit ten times more troops on
the battle field than developing a new metal which MAY one day have a use in
battle. Even one of the most popular
works of the time period, Euclid’s Elements,
is much more a pamphlet for engineers than the thesis of a doctoral
candidate.
The Egyptian people never long lived in peace. There were constant upheavals of the ruling
class, future pharaohs assassinating sitting pharaohs. The collapse of the Old Kingdom in the 22nd
century B.C.E. saw the local governments
rise up and take control resulting in many smaller warring communities which
lasted until about 2055 B.C.E. when one clan finally grew stronger than the
rest and asserted themselves rulers of all the land initiating the Middle
Kingdom. The Middle Kingdom was fairly
stable until around 1650 B.C.E. when a group of Asiatic settlers seized control
of the delta in Egypt eventually forcing the ruling powers out for nearly a
century. The New Kingdom would see the
pharaohs make militarization a great priority.
The New Kingdom was a period of constant change for Egypt. Some decades saw three different pharaohs,
all of whom instituted differing law.
Egypt had expanded further than ever before into the Middle East but
would see the strife on the people of the death of Ramesses II lose the area to
the Libyans. After the death of
Ramesses XI in 1078 B.C.E. the priest class, who had attained much wealth
through corruption, rose up and took control of true Egypt, while Egypt saw its
borders constantly shrink due to the invasions of the Libyans and
Assyrians. The Persians would follow
later annexing Egypt from 6th century to 4th century
B.C.E when they would hand it over to Alexander without a fight. The Greeks would then of course lose the area
to the Roman Empire three centuries later.
Four more civilizations would seize control after the Romans until we’d
finally reach the modern era.
If Egypt had been a more stable state, perhaps the focus of
study would have been on more theoretical science such as physics. Being as it has always been and will always
be in relative turmoil, that study which is most beneficial in the short time
of things is most likely to be that which is enacted.
This article originally written September 27th, 2008 for OU HSCI 3013 - History of Science to Newton.
No comments:
Post a Comment